Marc, may I ask how well you rated website content wizard...

[gannboy]

Hi Marc,

Daniel and yourself suggest of using WCW to rewrite articles up to 75% to be submitted to article directories.

I have gone over to PLRpro forum and read a lot of negative feedbacks of using this software from not prompt support given, video tutorial not useful, this software is difficult to use, so on, so on, so on...

May I know how you guys find using website content wizard...

Is it worth getting this software and am I able to get this software for $68.50 instead of $98.50?

Please advise.. thanks...

Eddy

[raj2006]

Hi Eddy,

I do own WCW.

For creating these 12 sites, we would be using the PLRPro articles on a 1:1 basis. That means, we will modify one article and either publish it in our site or submit it to iSnare. In other words, one article is converted to one other article.

Under the above scenario, I feel, the effort involved in creating a template in WCW for each article would be same as putting manual effort in changing the article.

I feel that WCW would be very useful when you want to churn out 10, 25 or more different articles from one article.

My two cents.

[raketek]

I have bought WCW since it was recommended in the 90 day challenge guide and now I have realized that, it does not help us in rewriting articles unless I am wrong, I have already made a post requesting Marc to create a video to demonstrate on how to use WCW to rewrite articles since it was the recommended software, I am still waiting Marc to respond to my post.

Thanks
Rake

[gillian]

I agree with Raj.

I think the real value of WCW comes when you want to create a number of articles. It's much faster to rewrite by hand on a one to one basis.

However, there is value in building up your personal thesaurus, which takes time. So although writing by hand is faster in the short term there's an argument that, eventually, if you import all 40 articles at once into WCW and you've spent sufficient time enlarging your personal thesaurus you could rewrite all 40 at the touch of a button.

It all depends on scale. Doing something by hand or yourself is often so much quicker in the large term but it's simply not sustainable if you want to build out your business. Hence, the need for outsourcing.

Having said all that, if your focus is to get the 90 Day done then I would rewrite by hand. Get the experience and the solid base to work on and then think about automating and outsourcing from that base.

Automating and outsourcing aren't much use to you if you don't have a business!

Gillian

[rexflay]

WCW is not the end all be all it was touted to be. I am not using the batch functions though. I bought it and thought it would help me rewrite articles, but its just a pain to use.

[raketek]

I have just sent a request for refund


-Rake

[Marc]

Okay the way we use wcw in the case of article submissions is this, and it all depends on how you do the submission too.

When doing an article for submission to article directories we will submit to the top 40 article directories.

I will use WCW to re-write the article and then also do modifications within that article and to 40 variations of the article.

That is where it can be very usefull. I do like the software and do find it helpful.

But not for the one-to-one rewrites.

I will clarify this in the guide so as to not point people in the wrong direction.

Thanks for letting us know about the issues.

Kind Regards
Marc

[habelow]

Marc,

And what about ISnare? They submit the one article we submit to them to hundreds of directories so you can't have any variations of the article. Also, do you do a complete rewrite when you submit to them?

[Marc]

Isnare is a great automated solution but you loose the functionality of being able to do as I stated below.

Habelow, it all depends on what method you have chosen to do things. If you have selected Isnare.com then you are saving time and getting a great benefit.

If you decide to do it manually then an extra 15 minutes to do a re-write for the directories (presuming you have wcw) is worth it.

We use both method's for different sites and different purposes.

Sometimes I'll even alternate between submitting manually and using a service.

Both methods work.

When I submit to Isnare.com I use a 75% rewrite, usually it is enough.

Regards
Marc

[bivie]

Originally Posted by johnmoses

I tend to agree with you but I am not too sure if I understand you clearly

That seems to be your favorite comment to make on this board,
doesn't it johnmoses.

That spammy method will probably work better on a blog somewhere,
but as for me, if you can't contribute, stop wasting everyone's time
with your useless posts.